Toyota Celica 1994 vs Mazda MX-3 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 43 HP more power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 26 NM more than Mazda MX-3. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.5 | |
| Toyota Celica consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda MX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Celica is 20 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 289 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota Celica has 6 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. This could mean that the Toyota Celica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |