Toyota Celica 1994 vs Honda Prelude 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 42 HP more power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Honda Prelude. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Prelude is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda Prelude gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |