Toyota Celica 1994 vs Honda Prelude 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Honda Prelude is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Honda Prelude. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`610 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |