Toyota Celica 1994 vs Toyota Corolla 1997
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Celica engine produces 6 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Toyota Corolla. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Corolla is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but lower. Toyota Celica is 12 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Toyota Corolla has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Toyota Celica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`510 kg | 1`615 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`170 kg | 1`080 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 340 kg | 535 kg | |
| Toyota Celica load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 57 procentiem less than Toyota Corolla. Therefore, Toyota Corolla is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |