Toyota Celica 1994 vs SAAB 9-3 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 89 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 126 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.43 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 21 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.1 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |