Toyota Celica 1994 vs Opel Calibra 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Opel Calibra is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 20 HP less power than Opel Calibra, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Opel Calibra. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Calibra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Calibra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Calibra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel Omega | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Calibra engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Calibra, 6 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 980 litres | |
| Toyota Celica has 17 litres less trunk space than the Opel Calibra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.1 metres less than that of the Opel Calibra, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Opel Calibra has
| |