Toyota Celica 1994 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 170 HP less power than Mitsubishi 3000 GT, whereas torque is 253 NM less than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 12.4 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.28 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Celica is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |