Toyota Celica 1994 vs Mazda MX-3 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 6 HP more power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Mazda MX-3. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MX-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda Xedos 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda MX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Celica is 20 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 135 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage capacity. Toyota Celica has 148 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |