Toyota Celica 1994 vs Honda CRX 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CRX is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 44 HP less power than Honda CRX, but torque is 4 NM more than Honda CRX. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CRX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used also on Honda Civic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger. Toyota Celica is 42 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda CRX has
| |