Toyota Celica 1994 vs Ford Puma 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Puma is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford Puma, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Ford Puma. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Puma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 3.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Celica is 44 cm longer than the Ford Puma, 8 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford Puma, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Ford Puma has
| |