Toyota Celica 1994 vs Ford Mustang 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 31 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 138 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Celica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.34 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |