Toyota Celica 1994 vs Audi TT 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 109 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 126 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.34 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 38 cm longer than the Audi TT, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 220 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage capacity. Toyota Celica has 63 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Audi TT has
| |