Toyota Celica 1994 vs Audi TT 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 34 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 56 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi TT might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi TT 2003 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.35 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 38 cm longer than the Audi TT, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 270 litres | |
| Toyota Celica has 13 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Audi TT has
| |