Toyota Celica 1994 vs Alfa Romeo GTV 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo GTV is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 34 HP less power than Alfa Romeo GTV, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Alfa Romeo GTV. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo GTV. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo 147, Alfa Romeo Spider | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo GTV might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Alfa Romeo GTV engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 14 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo GTV, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 110 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage capacity. Toyota Celica has 173 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo GTV. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.8 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo GTV, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Alfa Romeo GTV has
| |