Toyota Celica 2000 vs Toyota Celica 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica 2000 engine produces 49 HP more power than Toyota Celica 2002, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Celica 2002. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica 2000 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica 2000 could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica 2000 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica 2002 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Corolla | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica 2000 is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |