Toyota Celica 2000 vs Dodge Neon 2000
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 76 HP more power than Dodge Neon, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Dodge Neon. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.4 | |
|
The Dodge Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 5 cm shorter than the Dodge Neon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 371 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Dodge Neon has
| |