Toyota Celica 1999 vs Toyota Yaris 2001
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 37 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Yaris engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 29 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Used also on Toyota Urban Cruiser | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine Toyota Yaris 2001 1.5 engine: The NZ engine series was specifically developed by Toyota for compact cars. First introduced in 1997, these engines are still in production today, proving their longevity and reliability. With proper ... More about Toyota Yaris 2001 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 3.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but lower. Toyota Celica is 70 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 8 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 305 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`200 kg | 1`390 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |