Toyota Celica 1999 vs Dodge Neon 2000
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 172 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 27 HP more power than Dodge Neon, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Dodge Neon. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.4 | |
Toyota Celica consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.34 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.42 m | |
Toyota Celica is 5 cm shorter than the Dodge Neon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 371 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
| |