Toyota Celica 1999 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Toyota Celica engine produces 60 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 106 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Despite less power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 49 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |