Toyota Celica 1999 vs Audi TT 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
|
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 82 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 1999 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.34 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 30 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Audi TT has
| |