Toyota Celica 2002 vs Subaru Impreza 2005
| Body: | Coupe | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 32 HP more power than Subaru Impreza, but torque is 6 NM less than Subaru Impreza. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Impreza. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Subaru Impreza engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Corolla | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Subaru Forester, Subaru Legacy, Subaru XV | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Impreza might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.48 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 11 cm shorter than the Subaru Impreza, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 356 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |