Toyota Celica 2002 vs Mercedes CLK 2002

 
Toyota Celica
2002 - 2005
Mercedes CLK
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.7 Diesel
Petrol engines (Toyota Celica) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Mercedes CLK) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 192 HP170 HP
Torque: 180 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 seconds9.4 seconds
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive.
Toyota Celica engine produces 22 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, but torque is 220 NM less than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.46.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 225 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
830 km on highway1160 km on highway
630 km with real consumption830 km with real consumption
Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Celica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes CLK engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 12 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Toyota CorollaInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes G klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes CLK engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.35 m4.64 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.32 m1.41 m
Toyota Celica is 29 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Celica is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data435 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2002`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 28002800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Celica has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv