Toyota Celica 2002 vs Audi TT 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 192 HP | 225 HP | |
Torque: | 180 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 6.6 seconds | |
Audi TT is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 33 HP less power than Audi TT, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Audi TT. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 9.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.32 m | 1.34 m | |
Toyota Celica is 31 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Audi TT has
| |