Toyota Celica 2002 vs Audi TT 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 12 HP more power than Audi TT, but torque is 55 NM less than Audi TT. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi TT. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi TT engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Corolla | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Seat Ibiza, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi TT engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine: The engine is considered reliable, with a lifespan from 300,000 km.
The primary causes of unstable operation include air leaks through the crankcase ventilation system, throttle body malfunctions, idle air ... More about Audi TT 1998 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.35 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 31 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Audi TT has
| |