Toyota Celica 2002 vs Toyota Corolla 2004
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Celica engine produces 49 HP less power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Toyota Corolla. Due to the lower power, Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Used also on Toyota Celica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but lower. Toyota Celica is 15 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |