Toyota Celica 2002 vs Hyundai Coupe 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 38 HP more power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 27 NM more than Hyundai Coupe. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Celica consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Coupe might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Coupe engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.33 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 5 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |