Toyota Celica 2002 vs Honda Civic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Celica engine produces 23 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Honda Civic. Thanks to more power Toyota Celica reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Celica consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Celica consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda Civic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota RAV4, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota Celica 2002 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.40 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 9 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 441 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Civic has
| |