Toyota Celica 1993 vs Honda Prelude 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 179 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Celica engine produces 18 HP less power than Honda Prelude, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Honda Prelude. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.6 | |
| Toyota Celica consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Prelude, which means that by driving the Toyota Celica over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Celica is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Prelude has
| |