Toyota Celica 1993 vs Honda Civic 1996
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Toyota Celica engine produces 45 HP less power than Honda Civic, but torque is 2 NM more than Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.4 | |
| Toyota Celica consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used also on Honda CRX | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 335 litres | |
| Toyota Celica has 15 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Civic has
| |