Toyota Celica 1993 vs Honda Civic 1995
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 155 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
Toyota Celica engine produces 1 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.0 | |
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Celica consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Celica could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
850 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.38 m | |
Toyota Celica is 23 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`560 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Civic has
| |