Toyota Celica 1995 vs Volvo C70 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Volvo C70 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 163 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 220 - 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.5 - 11.3 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 22 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 262 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |