Toyota Celica 1995 vs Chrysler Stratus 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Chrysler Stratus has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 131 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 174 - 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 12.1 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 - 11.5 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Stratus. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 40 cm shorter than the Chrysler Stratus, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Chrysler Stratus, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Chrysler Stratus has
| |