Toyota Celica 1995 vs BMW 3 series 1993
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas BMW 3 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 115 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 168 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.7 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.35 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Celica is 7 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 230 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |