Toyota Celica 1995 vs Alfa Romeo Spider 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 150 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 186 NM | 186 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.3 - 8.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.6 - 11.2 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo Spider. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.33 m | 1.32 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 22 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo Spider, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 110 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.1 metres more than that of the Alfa Romeo Spider. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
| |