Toyota Celica 1990 vs Opel Calibra 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 204 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 275 NM | 170 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 6.8 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 9.2 | 7.8 - 11.2 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Calibra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 7 cm shorter than the Opel Calibra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 980 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Celica has 20 litres more trunk space than the Opel Calibra. The Opel Calibra may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Calibra, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`890 | ~ 1`692 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Opel Calibra has
| |