Toyota Celica 1990 vs Mitsubishi Eclipse 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 204 HP | 94 - 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 275 NM | 142 - 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 6.8 - 9.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 9.2 | 8.4 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Eclipse. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Eclipse, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 289 litres | |
|
Toyota Celica has more luggage capacity. Toyota Celica has 31 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Eclipse. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Eclipse, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`890 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
| |