Toyota Celica 1990 vs Mazda 323 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 204 HP | 56 - 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 275 NM | 99 - 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 8.8 - 16.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 9.2 | 5.9 - 9.2 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger, but lower. Toyota Celica is 31 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 309 litres | |
| Toyota Celica has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`890 | ~ 1`519 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |