Toyota Celica 1990 vs Mazda 323 1989

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Celica
1990 - 1994
Mazda 323
1989 - 1995
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol)1.3 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 105 - 204 HP56 - 106 HP
Torque: 142 - 275 NM99 - 151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 11 seconds8.8 - 16.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.0 - 9.25.9 - 9.2
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 323.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.42 m4.11 m
Width: 1.70 m1.68 m
Height: 1.30 m1.36 m
Toyota Celica is larger, but lower.
Toyota Celica is 31 cm longer than the Mazda 323, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres309 litres
Toyota Celica has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 323.
Turning diameter: 11 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`890~ 1`519
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 7800800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Celica has
  • only petrol engines available
Mazda 323 has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv