Toyota Celica 1990 vs Honda Prelude 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Prelude can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 204 HP | 133 - 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 275 NM | 179 - 212 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 7.3 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 9.2 | 8.6 - 8.8 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Prelude. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.29 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Celica is 2 cm shorter than the Honda Prelude, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`890 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Prelude has
| |