Toyota Celica 1990 vs Honda Civic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Civic can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 204 HP | 90 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 142 - 275 NM | 124 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 8.1 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 9.2 | 6.8 - 8.4 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.39 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Celica is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 410 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Toyota Celica has 90 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`890 | ~ 1`594 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Civic has
| |