Toyota Celica 1990 vs Honda Civic 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

Toyota Celica
1990 - 1994
Honda Civic
1996 - 2001
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Civic can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.4 - 1.6


Power: 105 - 204 HP90 - 160 HP
Torque: 142 - 275 NM124 - 153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 11 seconds8.1 - 13.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.0 - 9.26.8 - 8.4
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!


Length: 4.42 m4.46 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.30 m1.39 m
Toyota Celica is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Celica is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 320 litres410 litres
Honda Civic has more luggage space.
Toyota Celica has 90 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`890~ 1`594
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 7800800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Celica has
  • available with 4x4 drive
Honda Civic has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: