Toyota Celica 1994 vs Mazda MX-3 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda MX-3 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 - 242 HP | 90 - 135 HP | |
Torque: | 154 - 302 NM | 135 - 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 10.2 seconds | 8.5 - 10.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 9.5 | 6.9 - 9.5 | |
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.30 m | 1.31 m | |
Toyota Celica is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Celica is 20 cm longer than the Mazda MX-3, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | 289 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Toyota Celica has 6 litres less trunk space than the Mazda MX-3. This could mean that the Toyota Celica uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`635 | ~ 1`474 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |