Toyota Celica 1994 vs Honda CRX 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda CRX has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CRX can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 242 HP | 125 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 154 - 302 NM | 142 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 - 10.2 seconds | 8.2 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 9.5 | 7.5 - 8.1 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CRX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.30 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is larger. Toyota Celica is 42 cm longer than the Honda CRX, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 283 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 2 metres more than that of the Honda CRX, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`635 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda CRX has
| |