Toyota Celica 1999 vs Subaru Impreza 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Subaru Impreza has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive, while Subaru Impreza can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 1.5 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 105 - 280 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 180 NM | 142 - 392 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 5.4 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 7.9 - 10.9 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Subaru Impreza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.44 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 12 cm shorter than the Subaru Impreza, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Celica is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 401 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Impreza, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`736 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Subaru Impreza has
| |