Toyota Celica 1999 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 180 NM | 170 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
On average, the Toyota Celica 1999 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Toyota Celica 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica 1999 is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
| |