Toyota Celica 1999 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda 3 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mazda 3 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 180 NM | 145 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Toyota Celica is smaller. Toyota Celica is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 675 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`718 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |