Toyota Celica 1999 vs Honda Civic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda Civic has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 120 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 - 180 NM | 152 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 6.8 - 7.0 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.34 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.40 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 10 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Celica is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 441 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 1.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Toyota Celica can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`583 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Honda Civic has
| |