Toyota Celica 2002 vs Mazda RX-8 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda RX-8 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Toyota Celica is available with front wheel drive, while Mazda RX-8 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 192 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 180 NM | 211 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 10.8 - 11.4 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda RX-8. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.34 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Celica is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda RX-8, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 290 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda RX-8. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`779 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Mazda RX-8 has
| |