Toyota Celica 2002 vs Audi TT 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Audi TT has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Toyota Celica is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 | 1.8 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 192 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 180 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | 6.2 - 8.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 8.4 | 8.1 - 11.0 | |
|
Toyota Celica petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.35 m | |
| Toyota Celica is 31 cm longer than the Audi TT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Celica is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Celica is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Toyota Celica can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`200 | ~ 1`748 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Celica has
|
Audi TT has
| |