Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota RAV4 2001
Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 73 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 132 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.4 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Carina E engine produces 43 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 118 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Carina E consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
920 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Toyota RAV4 2000: Vehicle has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Carina E engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 18 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Corolla | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.69 m | |
Toyota Carina E is 33 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Carina E is 28 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
Toyota Carina E has more luggage capacity. Toyota Carina E has 70 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`930 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | high | |
Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |