Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 183 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Carina E engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Carina E consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.62 m | |
| Toyota Carina E and Toyota Picnic are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1250 litres | 1840 litres | |
| Toyota Carina E has 290 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Picnic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 590 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`700 kg | 2`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`180 kg | 1`335 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 520 kg | 675 kg | |
| Toyota Carina E load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Toyota Picnic. Therefore, Toyota Picnic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 210 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |