Toyota Carina E 1992 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Toyota Carina E engine produces 9 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Toyota Carina E reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Toyota Carina E consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Toyota Carina E over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Carina E consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Celica | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2000 1.8 engine: The 1ZZ-FE engine is more advanced, lighter, and simpler than its predecessor, emphasizing fuel efficiency and output. However, these improvements have come at the cost of reduced durability compared to earlier cast-iron engines. The engine block features an open-deck cooling design for easier production and lower ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.68 m | |
| Toyota Carina E is 33 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Carina E is 27 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota Carina E has more luggage capacity. Toyota Carina E has 70 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Carina E (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Carina E is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Toyota Carina E can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota Carina E has serious deffects in 265 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Carina E has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |